Also, looking at the bantu’s native environment the only thing they seem to lack to be true NA is imperialism, their natural way of living fulfills several prerequisites with only the conquest of others (something rarely achieved) being left out. As in they sit around and get into fights for no reason while food magically appears.
Goes to show that we can’t really live with them, especially as they are now. Charlemagne wouldn’t be nearly as lenient on them as he was on the Saxons.
Hmm, I'm not a self-identified Nietzschean, but I'll take a crack at this.
1. The idea here, I think, is that the purpose of a civilization is to achieve high culture through the aristocracy. It isn't necessarily that the Aristocracy is "parasitic" towards the lower class, but rather that the ruling elite should be focused on the pursuit of talent, art, or ingenuity rather than mechanistic labor (which in the past would be tilling the fields, but I would ascribe it to all sorts of menial repetitive tasks which pervade our society). I wouldn't call it any more parasitic than I would call a farmer parasitic who has his ox plow the fields. Black people don't produce any high culture without bourgeois apparatuses, they are quite well known in fact for squandering their wealth.
2. Demographic replacement is not what Nietzsche is talking about, I think... I think he is talking specifically about elite groups, minority groups, who rule through military force. I think aristocracies tend to fabricate these events though, like the "Sarmatian" Polish nobility was not actually Sarmatian. They just wanted to distinguish themselves. I think what is more important that the aristocracy is a sort of mobile entity. Aristocratic cultures come from nomadic or pastoral groups, which relates to the so-called "parasitism". Pastoral nomads don't have to do much actual labor, but they do have to be able to defend what is theirs.
3. Okay, the other points are fair but this is a little bit silly. Not everything Black people do is bad. In fact, not everything low-IQ people do is bad or wrong. Broken clocks are right twice a day, yadda yadda. Conservatism in general is more associated with lower than average IQ, at least in this day and age. And I don't think Black people are that endogamous. Yeah, they have some preference for their own race. All races do implicitly, and all races except for white people living in the west in the past 40 or so years do explicitly.
4. Appraisal of strength and beauty over intellect or good personality is sort of a different thing from appraisal of power over correctness. I don't necessarily agree with Nietzsche but the point of the latter is more that argumentation is a tool of the weak to entice the strong into giving them things. This is not a moral statement. You, personally, should care about the truth because lying to yourself is a form of insanity. But, being right doesn't actually do anything in the real world. It doesn't give you the ability to exact your will in the way power does, and so you shouldn't feel entitled to it. Black people do not actually have a monopoly on violence, which does not make them a true aristocracy. The US government has a monopoly on violence, and acts in a way which grants Black people special privileges. Black people are completely dependent on this entity, but do not make up the entity.
I don't really know if I would say Nietzsche is right about the aristocracy but he's onto something. The Aristocracy is still moralistic but less than the succeeding Bourgeoisie, which lead to the rise of Liberalism.
1. I just don't agree with "aristocracy means doing nothing practical", in fact that strikes me as very effeminate. The Founding Fathers, for example, were yeoman farmers wholly capable of doing the labor their slaves could do. I don't see decadence there the way I see it in the Nietzschean definition. Decadence (and the appearance of it) is another key feature of black culture.
2. In the bits I've read, and some of the videos I've watched, its a literal demographic invasion. Like when the British conquered India, they ousted the ruling class except for their puppets.
3. True, I am sort of hamming up the black people thing for dramatic effect. I don't have a problem with probably 50% of them. I think they do have a growing movement of "only reproduce with other blacks" tho, I see it all the time on social media
4. In places like Philadelphia, they have a monopoly on violence with the singular exception of outside help (FBI HRT) that would probably count as an invasion. If you smoke someone in the streets of Kensington, the police aren't going to do anything about it. While the government has the potential to assert itself, blacks still have the monopoly on day to day violence. We see this in their protection rackets, chokepoint lockdowns, neighborhoods divided up amongst lieutenants, etc.
When you said if "either of them faces consolidated civilizational opposition (Memphis SWAT" Layne I started dying man. Well written and excellent different perspective explained mate. Thx for the read!
Note if you like Nietzsche or follow him, I really don't intend this to be a killshot or dunk.
Great read, one of your best ones me thinks!
I realized when you said ‘ball sports’ lol.
Also, looking at the bantu’s native environment the only thing they seem to lack to be true NA is imperialism, their natural way of living fulfills several prerequisites with only the conquest of others (something rarely achieved) being left out. As in they sit around and get into fights for no reason while food magically appears.
Goes to show that we can’t really live with them, especially as they are now. Charlemagne wouldn’t be nearly as lenient on them as he was on the Saxons.
I don’t think they’ve “conquered” America but it’s safe to say they’ve subjugated it. They’re essentially our priest caste.
Yeah, didn’t mean to imply they did, although they’re not priests but sacred cows!
When reading it the first time I thought you were describing pre-kingdom Israelites lol
The “Mongolian horse archer raid tactics” are drive bys btw
Sea Nxggers is the funniest thing I've heard all day. Good stuff man.
Hmm, I'm not a self-identified Nietzschean, but I'll take a crack at this.
1. The idea here, I think, is that the purpose of a civilization is to achieve high culture through the aristocracy. It isn't necessarily that the Aristocracy is "parasitic" towards the lower class, but rather that the ruling elite should be focused on the pursuit of talent, art, or ingenuity rather than mechanistic labor (which in the past would be tilling the fields, but I would ascribe it to all sorts of menial repetitive tasks which pervade our society). I wouldn't call it any more parasitic than I would call a farmer parasitic who has his ox plow the fields. Black people don't produce any high culture without bourgeois apparatuses, they are quite well known in fact for squandering their wealth.
2. Demographic replacement is not what Nietzsche is talking about, I think... I think he is talking specifically about elite groups, minority groups, who rule through military force. I think aristocracies tend to fabricate these events though, like the "Sarmatian" Polish nobility was not actually Sarmatian. They just wanted to distinguish themselves. I think what is more important that the aristocracy is a sort of mobile entity. Aristocratic cultures come from nomadic or pastoral groups, which relates to the so-called "parasitism". Pastoral nomads don't have to do much actual labor, but they do have to be able to defend what is theirs.
3. Okay, the other points are fair but this is a little bit silly. Not everything Black people do is bad. In fact, not everything low-IQ people do is bad or wrong. Broken clocks are right twice a day, yadda yadda. Conservatism in general is more associated with lower than average IQ, at least in this day and age. And I don't think Black people are that endogamous. Yeah, they have some preference for their own race. All races do implicitly, and all races except for white people living in the west in the past 40 or so years do explicitly.
4. Appraisal of strength and beauty over intellect or good personality is sort of a different thing from appraisal of power over correctness. I don't necessarily agree with Nietzsche but the point of the latter is more that argumentation is a tool of the weak to entice the strong into giving them things. This is not a moral statement. You, personally, should care about the truth because lying to yourself is a form of insanity. But, being right doesn't actually do anything in the real world. It doesn't give you the ability to exact your will in the way power does, and so you shouldn't feel entitled to it. Black people do not actually have a monopoly on violence, which does not make them a true aristocracy. The US government has a monopoly on violence, and acts in a way which grants Black people special privileges. Black people are completely dependent on this entity, but do not make up the entity.
I don't really know if I would say Nietzsche is right about the aristocracy but he's onto something. The Aristocracy is still moralistic but less than the succeeding Bourgeoisie, which lead to the rise of Liberalism.
Good response, I’ll reply in depth later today
1. I just don't agree with "aristocracy means doing nothing practical", in fact that strikes me as very effeminate. The Founding Fathers, for example, were yeoman farmers wholly capable of doing the labor their slaves could do. I don't see decadence there the way I see it in the Nietzschean definition. Decadence (and the appearance of it) is another key feature of black culture.
2. In the bits I've read, and some of the videos I've watched, its a literal demographic invasion. Like when the British conquered India, they ousted the ruling class except for their puppets.
3. True, I am sort of hamming up the black people thing for dramatic effect. I don't have a problem with probably 50% of them. I think they do have a growing movement of "only reproduce with other blacks" tho, I see it all the time on social media
4. In places like Philadelphia, they have a monopoly on violence with the singular exception of outside help (FBI HRT) that would probably count as an invasion. If you smoke someone in the streets of Kensington, the police aren't going to do anything about it. While the government has the potential to assert itself, blacks still have the monopoly on day to day violence. We see this in their protection rackets, chokepoint lockdowns, neighborhoods divided up amongst lieutenants, etc.
When you said if "either of them faces consolidated civilizational opposition (Memphis SWAT" Layne I started dying man. Well written and excellent different perspective explained mate. Thx for the read!
Real
This is good work and provocative