When is the last time something happened? We’ve been edged a few times, but to no avail. Nothing ever happens anymore. Why?
To answer this question, we need to understand who is piloting our country. Like every other political body, we have elites- the behind-the-scenes custodial crew that filters politics, current events, really every aspect of life before it reaches the public. This is nothing new, every empire has its elites. As fellas on the right, we shouldn’t see a problem with elites or hierarchy in general, hierarchy is natural. The problem is the current elites are not our own. They’re a patchwork of entertainers, DC veterans that have never served in any office (Tucker Carlson is a great example despite being on “our” side mostly), Ivy League graduates, lobbyists, CEOs, and the usual assortment of financiers and politicians present in every elite class since time immemorial.
Every elite class has its own ambitions and personality. At the peak of the British Empire, Anglo elites placed emphasis on personal capability (evidenced by so-called Muscular Christianity, among other things), education, civilizing the land they’d conquered, and otherwise efficiently administering their empire. This was a time when the average Sir Humbledorf Niggleshirechesterworth XIV was equally capable of ballroom dancing, commanding an infantry battalion, speaking to his wife in Greek and his mistress in Latin, contributing to science in multiple fields, running a Frenchman through with his saber while on horseback, giving a University lecture, and playing the violin. Obviously, I think very highly of the British Empire and obviously, its elites were a lot more benevolent than the American Empire’s.
Our elites are just not interested in that sort of thing. Why?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7aa4f/7aa4f90f826c0e5fdafe24befd097f62cdbfecee" alt="What caused the decline of the British aristocracy? - Quora What caused the decline of the British aristocracy? - Quora"
As an aside, I’d be retarded to not mention Ted K’s distinction of Fighting Aristocracies vs. Leisured Aristocracies. Fighting Aristocracies are those that are engaged in actual conflicts in which their own survival is at stake. In the early 1800s, the British aristocracy was legitimately worried about Napoleon invading England. Their genetic potential and vigor were fully utilized in accomplishing a real, actual goal (known to Ted as the power process). By contrast, the American elite haven’t really felt this since the Civil War. Even post 9/11, the average Martha’s Vineyard resident was not exactly worried Al-Qaeda might be knocking on their door. Ted goes on to explain that Fighting Aristocracies are responsible for much of the high culture their civilizations are remembered for. On the other hand, complacent aristocracies are occupied with surrogate activities- other mountains to climb that are not as spiritually engaging as a fight for survival. He gives the example of Emperor Hirohito developing an autism for marine biology- pretty cool, but not the same thing as sending the Duke of Wellington into battle to halt Napoleon.
Consider the hypothetical case of a man who can have anything he wants just by wishing for it. Such a man has power, but he will develop serious psychological problems. At first he will have a lot of fun, but by and by he will become acutely bored and demoralized. Eventually he may become clinically depressed. History shows that leisured aristocracies tend to become decadent. This is not true of fighting aristocracies that have to struggle to maintain their power. But leisured, secure aristocracies that have no need to exert themselves usually become bored, hedonistic and demoralized, even though they have power. This shows that power is not enough. One must have goals toward which to exercise one’s power.
From Industrial Society and Its Future, available here.
I’ll be going back to this quote several more times to demonstrate…
American Elites as Leisured Aristocrats
It’s pretty obvious that America’s elites neatly meet the criteria for Leisured Aristocrats. They have no purpose, no mission. What is their reason to wake up in the morning? To make more money? One phone call to the Federal Reserve, or their Estate Manager in the Cayman Islands can fix that. To defeat their political opponents? Maybe, but nobody takes the Republican Party seriously (sole exception is Drumpf). Since WWII, the Right has lost the culture, education, political, etc. war. They’ve lost everything. Picking on Republicans is like picking on the Catholic Church, its not particularly fun anymore because they don’t punch back. Instead, they lay there in fetal position and whine and ask what they need to do to not be labelled racist. This example alone highlights the totality of the Right’s defeat in America, they play a game where the rules are dictated by their opponents. They ask what they’re allowed to disagree on. Sure, that may be fun for Leftist elites for a while. But that can’t be their reason to put their yarmulke on in the morning.
What is their goal?
Consolidation.
You see, today’s leftists still believe in the so-called End of History Theory. As Neo-Enlightenment progressives (with trace amounts of the Christian worldview still active, such as an affinity for compassion), they see time as a linear thing progressing towards a specific end (another concept unfortunately attributable to Christianity). As in, there is a moment when history has been “achieved” and we simply live in an eternal present. For neo-liberals, that moment occurred when secular, Jewish democracy asserted itself over the rest of the planet at the end of WWII. The bloodshed, drama, horror, heartbreak of history, all of it was put in cryostasis while the planet licked its wounds in the rubble of the last Allied bombing run. To Progressives, this was Armageddon- the final triumph of Good over Evil. The world was so shocked by the carnage and destruction inflicted on itself during WWII that it has basically sat there, shell shocked, ever sense.
Good! cries the Progressive. Now they just need to maintain this state of affairs until the end of time. To Progressives, WWII was so awful that it changed society’s elite’s goal forever. Now, their mission is to prevent conflict at any cost- more of a shepherding role because the lower classes have shown themselves incapable of self-management. Elites needed to step in, gently guiding the masses towards a peaceful, uncontroversial lifespan.
Maybe now you can see the emergence of Le Longhouse, Le nanny state. From birth, artificial economic conditions force both parents to work (if both are in the picture), so your kid goes to daycare, where obese orangutans will assault your children for inconveniencing them. Then, straight to “school”- where the goal is quite literally to calibrate drones to be compliant workers. It mirrors Henry Ford’s 8 hour workday model. To sit still, unstimulated, and accomplish procedural, rote tasks until your supervisor instructs you on the next task. The buck-breaking of your natural, human spirit and curiosity. Am I describing an assembly line in 1913, or a school day in Baltimore 100 years later?
This school model reinforces the elite desire to properly socialize children- stop fidgeting, use your inside voice, keep your hands to yourself, raise your hand to be called on, etc. Children leave these places having learned very little, aside from how to stop the bureaucracy from shining the spotlight on them for remedial training.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4e0a/c4e0a87085e1da454e8642ee60e24832222d1cab" alt="The Panopticon,' by Jenni Fagan - The New York Times The Panopticon,' by Jenni Fagan - The New York Times"
Anecdote side-story: I went to the park with my (now ex) GF a few months ago while a field trip was occurring. The children neatly filed off the bus while tired looking teachers (all female) patrolled the lines, shouting at the kids to not disturb anything. Prison guard imagery is applicable here. They marched down to the picnic tables while the teachers disseminated the day’s work, worksheet packets. I watched as the teachers prowled the tables, snarling at children who wiggled or looked up from their packets for too long. After a while, lunch (lunch meat sandwiches with Doritos and juice boxes) was issued before the kids were turned loose in a 100 sqft box to “go outside”. The entire time, the teachers looked super anxious, eyes darting to prevent something from happening. Before I left, I saw them converging on a kid that was making a break for the woodline and away from direct supervision. Wtf is the point of taking them outside when you neuter “outside” into being a manicured patch of mowed grass? Why are you surprised when little boys become escape artists?
As a kid in the 2000s, I at least got to play in the creek during field trips to the park. Now I’ve been told by my friend that’s a teacher that they aren’t allowed to play running tag because they could get hurt. This is prime “nothing can happen” enforcement.
Also, I can see how the soybean oil chips are useful in some abstract way for keeping the kids complacent. Sort of like the fluoride argument. Like, its technically in the Elite’s interest to have kids suffer “meatless mondays” in schools because your brain requires fats and proteins to develop. IDK
BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAP
When these children entire larger society, they’re fully lobotomized worker drones. They travel from A to B while keeping their hands to themselves, raising their voices, or otherwise doing anything to rock the boat. They don’t cause too much trouble, they don’t speak out of turn. The mere act of sitting in public and not being on your phone is now considered weird. Millennials will shriek about you “not getting on down the road”, or doing whatever it is you need to do. Loitering is a cardinal sin in today’s world, speaking with strangers an almost arrest-able offense. Why? Because the system needs to ensure nothing happens. Speaking with someone who isn’t vetted might lead to an argument, or an altercation, or an unauthorized opinion forming, entirely offline and away from the watchful eye of the Nanny State. All of these are deeply troubling to an elite who’s mission is pouring water on the last few embers of American individualism and independent spirit. Nothing can happen, no matter the cost of Something-prevention.
Another easy example: any East Coaster knows how awful camping is unless you travel to the Appalachians. Nannies spam rules about everything from swimming, to camping, to merely standing under a gazebo. Reservations, fees, administrative conveniences, contact information forms, permits all are staples of modern East Coast camping. Why? Because nothing can ever happen. Unpermitted (untaxed) camping could cause forest fires! Camping without registration means someone can get lost! Illegally occupying a gazebo in the rain might lead to noise ordnance violations! All of these are instances of something happening, which the system cannot allow.
It’s quite easy to extend the impacts of this programming to politics- obedient little voters will be informed by state owned media (the teacher) of the correct opinion, any side conversations at your desk during programming will result in being singled out for punishment (The FBI will drag you out of your house at 3am to put you in a holding cell without a lawyer or charges). Questions are only entertained after raising your hand, when the teacher can properly vet you for body language, intentions, etc.
Our Leisurely Aristocrats have to ensure nothing happens. They’re in the driver’s seat, they are in victory formation, its about running the clock out until people die by making sure nothing ever happens. When Trump was elected, there were a few times where something almost happened (remember when he threatened to arrest Hillary, anyone?), the perma-bureaucracy made sure that his presidency accomplished very little. Obunga tripled the size of bureaucracies like the FBI, how many of those positions did Trump abolish?
Even Keynesian economics is about ensuring nothing ever happens, quantitative easing serves the role of more alcohol to delay the hangover- forever.
Leisurely Aristocracies Don’t Last Long, the Cracks are Already Forming!
So, the marching orders for our elites are clear. Consolidate power into the uniparty, prevent anything from happening. I think its funny that many of them were energized into Fighting Aristocrats because of Trump, as if his election was a challenge for their survival. The enthusiasm with which they plotted against him was deranged, and delicious.
How long can they keep it up? There’s a lot of factors to consider. For one, they’ve been good at it for about 80 years. What has happened since the end of WWII? Not much that matters on a historical, global scale. Vietnam? 60,000 serfs (from a population of 300m+) perishing overseas isn’t that important historically. Go listen to “We Didn’t Start the Fire” and count how many times something happened, maybe 1-2.
Another factor mostly in their favor is the ethnic replacement underway in the US. Blacks and Hispanics simply do not challenge the system the way whites do. In fact, they are guaranteed to vote straight Democrat. They’re obedient little sled dogs, for the most part. So the machine crushes them into places of responsibility that they otherwise could not reach by merit. But this is a short term solution that brings a medium term problem. How many unqualified blacks can fly airplanes before its a problem? How many blacks can be handwaved through medical school before its a problem? How many illegal Guatemalan construction crews tasked can be tasked with maintaining America’s crumbling infrastructure before its a problem? Elites are insulated from this stuff because they live, as a rule, surrounded by white attendants that are in their courts through merit. You’ll never catch a diversity hire flying Obama’s plane, for example. But, the peasants will start to get pissed off when they keep dying from bridges collapsing, medical error rises to be the #1 cause of death (instead of #3), their police are utterly incapable of deterring crime, etc. In a way, this is something happening. Idk how elites plan on dealing with this, but I imagine it won’t be by securing the border.
On the flip side, ensuring nothing ever happens means having total control of everything, always. This is hard to do, even with the emergence of the Internet as a population pacification and surveillance tool. No elite corps has ever accomplished this, at least not for very long. We’ve seen instances where they’ve failed, and something (small) happens. The problem is, their playbook involves distracting the serfs that noticed with something far worse. But, this can only work so many times. Idk why iFunny made fun of the “this is a distraction from Hunter Biden’s laptop” thing. That laptop could’ve been the silver bullet to cause something to actually happen, instead the story was buried by sanitized news about aliens or whatever.
Ole reliable has increasingly been spamming mass shootings, as assets willing to perpetrate one, and the equipment/alibi necessary, are pretty cheap to produce. The FBI keeps a stable of potential shooters, and can clog up the national discourse for at least 24 hours whenever necessary (except for that time there wasn’t a single mass shooting during the government shutdown, lmao). The problem is, people are growing desensitized to tragedy. Who knows what they’ll try next.
All Elite classes fail, inevitably. Even my beloved British aristocrats were extinguished with a whimper instead of a roar. Ours cannot keep this up forever, and maybe the pendulum will swing back to the right after. I think our elites are complacent and bored like Ted K said. They’re making mistakes and increasingly have to rely on badge flashing to maintain the narrative:
Epstein murder poorly and falsely disguised as a suicide. (I think he’s still alive btw)
Vegas shooting falsely attributed to a single gunman even as footage shows a perfect L shaped ambush
Vaccine falsely established as safe and effective by handwaving and badge flashing
People sitting in jail cells right now for fraud in the 2020 election, mainstream media still allowed to falsely claim it was the “most secure ever”.
Russian collusion narrative makes awful attempt at framing Trump, backfires completely
All of these were attempts at ensuring nothing ever happens that failed. I think this is mostly due to the elite being complacent, and appointing idiots to carry out their bidding because they’re loyal- and because they feel bulletproof.
This is the course of empire, and the tab they’re running up by relying on badge flashing will eventually spill over into something happening. I don’t know what it will spill over into, as most people are still deathly afraid of stepping out of line. But, we did see how frantic and poorly managed our elites were during the J6 thing, which was still orchestrated by their own FBI. This is partly due to the fact they live in bubbles where the consequences of their own actions never reaches them. When it does, they have no exposure to something happening, and sperg out. Decay is a double edged sword I suppose.
Conclusion / TLDR
We saw why our elites act the way they do, what drives them to accomplish that mission. I compared the elite of 2024 America to Ted K’s leisurely aristocracy, an aristocracy that has no mission and thus becomes bored and decays. I also made some predictions about how long they can keep the charade up for, in all reality maybe another 20 years before we reach a boiling point.
Hunter Biddn Notification jumpscare
Not reading this cause that would result in something happening today